How Does This Relate?

Imagine for a moment that you are the owner of a successful business, and you want to expand your operations. There are a number of ways to go about this directly, such as opening new markets, moving into new customer demographics, or trying to take business away from your competition. Alternately, you could move into closely related products or services – if your company currently makes hammers, for example, you could move into screwdrivers or files, or other products that are made from similar ingredients (tool-steel) and marketed to similar customers (hand-tool users). This will increase your potential revenue, and will also provide some protection against disturbances in the market – if the market for hammers drops off, the market for screwdrivers may not. This type of strategy is referred to as related diversification; it’s distinct from unrelated diversification, which would be expansion into completely unrelated industries. For example, if we own a company that makes hammers and we decide to open a flower shop. Or, perhaps, if we own a company that makes and sells men’s clothing and we decide to open a restaurant…

Whether you consider unrelated diversification a valid strategy or not is a matter of personal preference, but you may want to watch how Brooks Brothers does with their steakhouse before you make your final decision on that point. A story in last week’s New York Post claims that the famous retailer is planning to repurpose a large retail space around the corner from its New York flagship store into an upscale steakhouse sometime during the 2014 calendar year. There are no details yet, but New York City is already home to a number of premium steak restaurants, and it seems obvious that anyone attempting to break into that market will require more than name recognition and a clever stunt to get the public’s attention. If the company can somehow come up with an absolutely top-grade steakhouse operation they might be able to compete on either cost or value or both, and if they can use their name recognition to get people to come in and try the place, they might have a chance…

How likely any of that is remains to be seen. Clearly the company has a well-established brand image that goes back to 1818 and conveys the impression of superior quality and workmanship, if not the most competitive price. And this is hardly the first attempt to use an unrelated brand and/or reputation to develop a food service operation. In recent years we have seen a number of companies not normally associated with food open (or license someone else to open) branded restaurants using their name and logo, notably including cable television network ESPN and motorcycle manufacturer Harley Davidson. And while the company does not appear to have any significant experience in food service, they are very well known for both superior customer service and world-wide product distribution. With over 300 retail locations in place and a number of possible ways to cross-promote products, this idea may not be so odd after all…

I can’t help wondering how many other companies might be contemplating similar moves – or would if they saw Brooks Brothers pull this off. Would we next encounter McDonald’s sportswear? Apple coffee houses? Starbuck’s health and beauty products? The one constant I have noticed in my years as a business teacher and a management consultant is that no idea is too outlandish that someone somewhere hasn’t considered turning it into a consumer business – and if bacon-flavored salt, vodka and personal lubricant can all be winners, what’s wrong with a super-premium retailer branching out into a super-premium restaurant?

This isn’t to suggest that the new venture will be easy, if it isn’t just a publicity stunt in the first place. I’m just noting that it won’t be the strangest thing we’ve seen this week, let alone this decade…