You can pick up the original Yahoo story here, but the basic idea
is a couple was flying home from a vacation when they were bumped off their
flight because Air Canada had sold more tickets on that flight than their
airplane had seats, resulting in their not being able to get home in time to
pick up their small children from the sitters who were watching the kids. In
the end, the parents were most of day late in getting home, after the airline
finally bumped someone else to make room for them on a later flight. As
atrocities go it’s not very impressive; I have no reason to believe that the
children were ever in danger, for example, and there is no indication that
being delayed had any significant long-term effect on the passengers – although
I doubt they will take any chances with their timing in the future. What struck
me about the story was the outrage it seems to have generated, and the complete
lack of understanding regarding why this practice will almost certainly
continue…
I’m not going to argue the ethics of overbooking an airplane
knowing that for a non-zero percentage of your flights that will mean that some
people fail to make their destination; that’s a post for another day. But why
does anyone use this practice in the first place? It seems as though a business
that is essentially a commodity – most passengers don’t really care which
airline they fly on, provided it gets them where they want to go on time –
would want to make every attempt to maintain good customer relations and a
positive public image. What the passengers don’t realize is that they are the
cause of overbooking, and that it occurs because they demand it…
If an airplane takes off with empty seats it is losing
money; the fuel savings (because of the lower weight onboard) do not approach
the revenue lost on those empty seats. But not all passengers will be able to
be on time for every flight, so the airline sells more than 100% of the seats,
hoping that enough people will fail to show up to make good the overage. The
airline could cover those costs in other ways, of course – through the use of
expensive fees for cancellation or rebooking of a flight, or by raising the
overall ticket price to cover the cost of people dropping out at the last
minute. But passengers will not tolerate either of these things, and will
gravitate towards airline with lower prices and fees, even if their chance of
being bumped off a flight is much greater. It’s still a chance, you see,
whereas the higher fares and fees are a certainty…
Time was, being bumped off of a flight was an unpleasant event,
but it didn’t happen all that much, and most people just accepted it as a
possible consequence of flying. Today, more and more people are missing their
flights, or simply blowing them off, but still demanding low fares and minimal
rebooking charges – and when they don’t get their own way, they’re complaining
to their national governments or bringing civil lawsuits or both. But the costs
of that litigation and government action increase the cost of doing business
for the airline, and all of the prices they charge the customer have to be
raised to keep pace. If we’re really in a feedback loop, and if nothing is done
to stop it, eventually the current airline business model will become
completely unsustainable and the industry as we know it will collapse…
Not exactly the end of civilization, I admit. But I still
hope I’m wrong about this…
No comments:
Post a Comment