Then the story surfaced in the Los Angeles Times about the
U.S. Army's Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle program being cancelled,
and the single $297 million prototype being sold back to the British company
that built it for $300,000. That’s right; in this case we paid nearly $300
million for an aircraft we’re not even going to keep and stick in the desert
for possible future use. But the numbers don’t really tell the whole story
here. Consider in addition that the Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle
is an unmanned blimp, 300 feet long and 85 feet tall, and was expected to
operate at about 20,000 feet over the battlefield for up to three weeks at a
time. We should probably also add that the vehicle only ever made one test
flight, during which it was determined that the 12,000 pounds of overweight it
had packed on during its development had left it unable to lift the sensors and
communications gear it had originally been intended to carry…
Now, to be fair, the Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence
Vehicle is hardly the most spectacular waste of money and resources to come out
of the US Military/Industrial complex. Certainly it has nothing on the $6.97
billion dollars (in 1981 dollars, no less) originally awarded for the M247
Sergeant York air defense system, which was eventually cancelled after
repeatedly failing to shoot down a stationary balloon. Lighter-than-air craft
have a long history as military observation platforms, and it isn’t too
far-fetched to imagine that a drone version of one might be as useful as its
heavier-than-air drone cousins. What is truly amazing about the Long Endurance
Multi-Intelligence Vehicle project is the amount of money spent on absolutely
nothing of substance – and the fact that such programs are still being funded
after the failure of the M247, the A-12 attack aircraft, and so many others that
have not only failed but also left their supporters open to mockery over the
decades…
Back in the 1940s and 1950s anything having to do with
atomic weapons was in vogue; projects that could even vaguely offer additional
nuclear capability were funded despite a complete lack of reason or sanity,
such as the Davey Crockett rifle, otherwise known as the “Atomic Bazooka” – a weapon
with a range of a mile or so and a blast radius of almost three-quarters of a
mile. In the 1960s anything that could possibly help us beat the Soviets into
space was going to get funded, and during the 1980s anything that could help keep
them from overrunning Western Europe had top priority, however implausible it
might be. So it’s hardly surprising that in this time, when unmanned combat
vehicles are the in thing, that an unmanned platform that could remain on
station for weeks at a time would find acceptance despite being the
stupidest-looking idea to come along in fifty years…
I’m hoping that this will remain the worst example of
government excess for a while, or at least the worst example of our government
spending hundreds of millions of dollars it doesn’t have on crackpot aerospace
development programs that a small child could have told them were silly ideas
for a while. But I am very much afraid that it won’t be. Keep watching the
skies, folks…
No comments:
Post a Comment