If you have an unusually
strong stomach you can pick up the ABC News story about this action, but don’t
say I didn’t warn you. As announced, the initiative will keep these elements of
our national power grid active, regardless of local need or cost-effectiveness,
as a matter of National Security. Why, exactly, power generation units that can’t
be operated at a profit are critical to the security of the United States isn’t
explained in the memo that turned up on Friday. The Department of Energy merely
claims that nuclear, coal, and oil-fired power plants are a “critical” part of
the national grid, and without them we might be vulnerable to… Well, to
something; they didn’t specify what. You’d have to be a real cynic to suggest
that this action is being taken solely to curry support from the people who own
obsolescent power plants and coal mines – and the people who work in those
industries, of course…
Regrettably, the people at
ABC News are apparently that cynical, as are industry watchdog groups,
government accountability groups, environmentalist groups, and the Energy
Information Administration, all of whom have criticized the announcement as
nothing more than a political move intended to make good on a campaign promise
from the last Presidential election. The truth is that use of coal for
electrical generation has been dropping every year for over a decade, decreasing
by over 20% in just the last year, and it would be redundant to specify the
costs of using oil for power, or the environmental consequences of nuclear
power and nuclear waste. Requiring companies to keep those plants open, and
(effectively) requiring utility companies to keep purchasing the output from
those plants, will result in higher costs to consumers and benefit no one
except the coal companies and whoever owns the obsolete power plants…
What makes this particular
story so remarkably nauseating is that no one in the Administration has denied
any of this, or offered any support for the contention that maintaining these
facilities has some strategic or defense purpose. It’s not exactly surprising,
given the other abuses of power for personal enrichment that we have seen from
this Administration, or given the fact that our current Secretary of Energy
does not believe that we need a Department of Energy, or given the fact that
our current head of the EPA is openly an industry flak who (apparently)
believes that air and water pollution are good for you. It’s just exceptionally
brazen, even for American politics, and exceptionally lazy for anyone in this
21st Century…
I normally stay away from
political issues in this blog because, as previously noted, it’s not my area of
expertise and I feel there are already more than enough blogs offering
political opinions written by someone without any particular qualifications. I’ve
also stated for the record that I believe that cronyism, corruption, and
pork-barrel politics are an unavoidable part of any representative democracy,
and as long as we can keep them down to no more than a slightly regrettable level
we will still be doing far better than any other system of government enacted to
date. But when the party that is nominally in favor of small government, free-market
capitalism, and responsible fiscal policy starts doing things this blatantly
self-serving I think we are all justified in complaining about the
incompetence, if not the actual policy. Face it, folks, these people aren’t
even trying anymore…
No comments:
Post a Comment