First off, we need to
acknowledge that neither members of the far-right political groups nor White
House Press Secretaries are protected classes in the United States, nor is
refusing to do business with someone because you loath their politics
considered a discriminatory policy as such. Despite all of the pearl-clutching
indignation rising from the Right, the restaurant owner in question did not
commit any crime, Federal or state, when she asked the current Press Secretary
to leave her establishment. Nor can these commentators claim any moral grounds
for their complaints, since they have been loudly supporting the right of
business to refuse service to customers on the basis of gender orientation. But
those are the legal and moral aspects of the case; what are the ethics of the
situation?
On the one hand, the owner of
any business has an ethical obligation to his or her employees, vendors, community
members, local taxpayers, and other stakeholders to generate revenue, and
hopefully profit. Refusing a paying customer can be seen as ignoring those
responsibilities, in addition to being bad business practice in an absolute
sense. We could also point out that in most cases the employee does not
determine their employer’s policies or politics; a Press Secretary does not
make national policy, she just answers questions about it, to take the current
example. It is possible that the current Press Secretary, as the daughter of
one far-Right politician and a senior advisor to another, might agree with the
extreme conservatism that so angered the business owner, but as a general
principle we can’t assume this to be the case…
On the other hand, the owner
of any business has the same ethical obligation to promote their establishment
by appealing to the largest number of customers as possible. Again, I have no
data to suggest that most of the patrons of this specific restaurant are
particularly left-of-center in their political leanings, or even that they are
more liberal than the current Administration, but as a general principle, if
the majority of your clientele support any specific position, whether that is
the Democratic Party or the Boston Red Sox, it makes some amount of sense to
appeal to those same loyalties in running your business. I’m not saying you
should throw Yankees fans out of a Red Sox bar, for example, but Yankees fans
are not a protected class either, and if ejecting one makes all of your other
customers cheer and order another round, you could make a case for it being
good for business and supporting at least your first and second bottom lines…
Which brings me to the
question: Do we, as business owners or manager, have any ethical responsibility
to provide service or sell products to customers whom we despise on a personal
or political level? Assuming that the practice does not involve discrimination
towards people from any protected class or for anything (age, gender, race,
etc.) that is beyond their control, do we have the right to refuse service to
such individuals? Does our answer change if doing so would be good for business?
Or if serving such individuals will drive away other customers and be bad for
business? Or should we just provide services or sell products to anyone who can
pay for them, and let all other considerations slide?
It’s worth thinking about…
No comments:
Post a Comment