You can pick up the story off the Courthouse News site if
you want to, but the story is simple enough. Members of the class are claiming
that they were given false and unrealistic promises by the culinary school they
attended, and are now stuck with $45,000 or more of student debt they can’t
possible pay off and completely useless training – or, at least, nothing that
would get them better than the aforementioned $8 to $12 per hour jobs. Suits of
this kind are popping up more and more often, and I don’t intend to comment on
the ethics of lying to your students, or any other customer, about the relative
value and utility of the services you provide; I don’t feel there is any other
side to the discussion. Preying upon the hopes and dreams (and naivety) of the
customer in this fashion is fraud, and I hope the person or persons responsible
are charged with criminal offenses and sued repeated in civil court as well. But
this does raise the question of how far a company should be required to go in
order to discourage potential customers…
Consider, if you will, that all service-based companies make
money by providing some kind of (hopefully useful) service to their customers. Expecting
an educational institution of any kind to turn away prospective students with
money in hand isn’t reasonable, any more than expecting any other kind of
service business to reject a customer would be, provided that the student can
afford the course of study and has a reasonable chance of obtaining the
credentials promised and getting the results he or she desires. But what about
the case where one or more of these conditions do not clearly apply?
Suppose, for example, that there are high-paying jobs in the
field in question, but only a few of them each year for thousands of applicants
– can we still expect the school to refuse this student? What if there are jobs
in the field, but the student in question is unlikely to complete the program
or obtain sufficiently impressive credentials to get any of them? What if there
are jobs available, and the student can qualify to get them, but the student
loans they will need to complete the course of study will destroy their
economic future and eliminate any chance of their buying a house or saving for
retirement? How bad do someone’s chances of completing the ambition that
brought them to the school have to be before we can reasonably expect the
institution to send them away?
Which leads me to the question: do we, as managers, have an
ethical responsibility to our customers to refuse them service if we believe
that they have no chance of receiving the full benefit they want from our
company? Does our answer change if we have provided the customer with a
complete breakdown of the field, the service and the odds of success, but they
persist anyway? No reasonable person is going to suggest that a qualified
customer who can afford service should be denied it, or that a customer with a
completely unrealistic expectation should be served. But at what point do
someone’s odds of success become so bad that we must tell them to give up on
our services and look for some other approach?
It’s worth thinking about…
No comments:
Post a Comment