If you’re not familiar with the Apple Watch – and you may
not be, since the things are not for sale as of this writing – the descriptions
of it that we have seen so far suggest that it really is a watch; you wear it
on your wrist and you can use it to tell what time it is. You can also use it
to get weather reports, stock quotes and reminders from your calendar, or to
send and receive text messages and play music. The units will have a limited
ability to tie into health-related applications on your telephone, and can
monitor the number of steps you take during a workout and similar factors.
Naturally, you will need to have a functioning smart phone on your person for
any of these functions to work; the watch itself will not have cell phone or Wi-Fi
connectivity. In fact, it’s really more of a peripheral for your phone – and,
in the case of the gold-plated ones, a fashion statement – than the two-way
wrist communicators beloved of some science fiction settings. The real question
is who is going to buy the things?
As the Times reporter correctly notes, a lot of young adults
today don’t even wear watches anymore; you will generally see them checking
their phones for the time. But older customers, who do wear watches, are far
less likely to see a use for a remote/peripheral device for their phones. One
of the true advantages to an old-fashioned analog watch is that it will
continue to function even if your cell phone’s battery is dead, the local cell
network is down, or you happen to be an inconvenient distance from the nearest
cell tower. And unlike certain markets and segments Apple has invaded in the
past, in this case there is no population of users for them to take over,
because this product category has never existed until now…
Now, I don’t want to sound like I’m beating up on Apple.
Every company has to find the ideal balance between how much of their time they
spend making money off of products and properties they already own, and how
much of their time they spend exploring new products or technologies that will
help them to make money. Apple has gotten this question right more often than
not; there’s a reason they are still around and still profitable after nearly
40 years. They’ve got a lot riding on the new product category this time,
though; the Apple Watch is the first major new product type to appear under
their new CEO’s leadership, and if it fails badly enough this could cost the
company in terms of investor confidence and cost of capital, not just money
wasted on developing, producing and marketing a product no one wants to buy…
If Apple has guessed right, then wearable computers (and
peripherals) really are the next big thing, and we can probably expect to see
an increasingly sophisticated array of wrist-mounted computing platforms appearing
over the next few years, some of which may eventually replace the smart phones
they are currently just connected to. If they are wrong, the Apple Watch may be
about to join the Newton, the Lisa, and the Apple TV system as ideas whose time
just hadn’t arrived yet. And if Apple is able to leverage the development of the
Watch system into a new product line or category that they can sell, then the
actual success of the Apple Watch is irrelevant; the company will make back its
money through later developments of the same technology – just as they did in
all of the above cases…
No comments:
Post a Comment