Consider, for example, the case where someone has genuinely
come up with an idea so wonderful that its development and expansion really
will change the world for the better. It seems reasonable to assume that there
are some inventions, like a cure for cancer, or a renewable energy source that
would replace fossil fuels, that would improve the quality of life for so many
people for so long that it would be heartless not to assist the inventor. There
have been very few historical examples, since most often anybody capable of
envisioning something that revolutionary is also, by definition, also capable
of inventing it. By the same token, just coming up with an idea is not the same
thing as creating it; I can imagine a clean, safe, renewable energy source that
would power the entire world, but I could not begin to tell you how to make
such a thing. And anybody who could probably doesn't need my help in coming up
with the idea...
On the other side of the issue, there will inevitably be
those ideas which are so absurd that if your well-meaning idea person even
reveals them to anyone less understanding than you, he or she will be lucky to
avoid public ridicule, threats of violence, actual violence, or (in extreme
cases) criminal prosecution. Attempting to pursue or develop this idea will
subject the inventor to personal disgrace, financial ruin, alienation of their
friends, avoidance by their family members, divorce proceedings by their
spouse, and destruction of their career if they are lucky (see the
aforementioned violence and/or prosecution). In these cases it would seem
heartless not to attempt to dissuade the "visionary" from pursuing
the idea at all. But doing so will at the very least require you to expend
hours of your time and risk losing whatever friendship you have with that
person; in extreme cases you may find yourself practicing counseling, law or
medicine without a license...
Clearly, there is a spectrum of ideas, ranging from things
so incredible that anyone would have an ethical responsibility to help make
them a reality to things so incredibly bad that anyone would have an ethical
responsibility to try and help whoever came up with them get psychiatric help.
But most ideas will fall somewhere into the grey area between those extremes,
and the vast majority will end up being nothing more than meaningless
boondoggles that will accomplish nothing of consequence while devouring your
time, your money and your good name. The difficulty lies in trying to tell the
difference - and figuring out what to do in the appropriate case. All of which
leads me to ask the question:
Do we, as consultants, writers, businesspeople, or caring
human beings have any responsibility to help another person evaluate, develop,
or discard their visionary ideas? Does our answer change if the person who
wants our help is a family member or a close friend? Does it change if there is
a significant financial reward available to us if we're right, or a major
consequence to us or those close to us if we're wrong? Or should we mind our
own business, not interfere in somebody else's flashes of genius or madness (as
the case may be), and offer our professional services at reasonable rates as
always?
It's worth thinking about...
No comments:
Post a Comment