In
the case of United Airlines, it would appear that the answer is: “Run out of
toilet paper during an International flight…”
You
can pick up the original story from the Daily Finance site if you want to, but
the basic facts are simple enough. On a flight from San Francisco to London a
United Airlines flight ran out of toilet paper and had to put a stack of
cocktail napkins in one of the lavatories. It’s one of those stories that would
be a lot funnier in a business that doesn’t operate complex machinery at 520
knots flying 30,000 feet over major population centers. As it is, you have to
wonder what other details the company is letting slip. Granted that servicing the
lavatories isn’t as important as servicing the engines, or that running out of
toilet paper isn’t as much of a problem as running out of fuel, hydraulic fluid,
or even food and water, it’s not a good detail to forget – and it happened in
an industry where a reputation for NOT forgetting the details is critical…
Now,
I’m not going to suggest that the fact that one of the workers responsible for
servicing an airplane forgot to check on a basic supply level means that the
company is in any greater danger of a catastrophic crash than they already
were. Nobody runs preflight checks on the toilet paper supply (the way they do
on fuel and hydraulics and such) precisely because the penalty for failure isn’t
nearly as high. Similarly, baggage handlers are not monitored and supervised as
closely (or paid as well) as maintenance personnel or flight crews because if
they screw up and damage a passenger’s $5,000 guitar the worst you’re going to
have to endure as a result is 12 million views of a video that mocks you, not
tens of millions of dollars in lawsuits from the families of the crash victims.
The problem is that from a business standpoint this is a difference of degree,
not a different concern…
If
a company cares so little about my comfort and satisfaction that they can’t
afford to have a supervisor with a checklist double-check the between-flight
servicing of the airplane, why should I believe that they care about my health,
wellbeing, property, on-time arrival or ultimately even survival? If they are
willing to cut corners to this extent, where do they draw the line? Why should
I believe that they care in the least whether or not I make my connecting
flight? Given a scenario where it would be more profitable to settle a lawsuit
with my heirs than it would to get me safely to my destination, how can I be
sure they wouldn’t just take the higher profits?
It’s
always a mistake to ask how much worse things can get, or how much lower
someone would be willing to go – because there’s always someone who will go
lower. In the case of United Airlines, however, I would have to say that they
have now hit bottom – and are starting to dig…
No comments:
Post a Comment