Sunday, July 29, 2012

The Ethics of Causes

There’s a point that seems to be getting lost in all of the current protests and counter-protests against Chick-Fil-A and some of the similar actions we have seen in recent years, which might be described as “blasphemy is in the eye of the beholder” – except that this would offend some of our atheist friends, who would insist that blasphemy is a concept used by theocratic dictatorships to exert control over the ignorant and superstitious. Which is exactly the point, actually: no matter who you are or what you believe, or how innocuous you think any specific cause or charity is, there’s probably someone out there who believes that the same cause or charity is the embodiment of all of the evil in the universe. And sooner or later, if you both live long enough, they’re probably going to come by and stage a protest in your place of business…

Now, I will concede that in the Chick-Fil-A case the cause and counter-cause are highly polarizing, and even an idiot could have predicted that there would be a massive political and social outcry over them, even before the CEO started stirring the pot by calling attention to his affiliation with groups on one side of the issue. Likewise, any company that willingly becomes involved in anything having to do with tax reform, healthcare reform, immigration reform, school prayer, gun control, national identification cards, or reproductive freedom is being disingenuous if they claim not to have been aware that a confrontation might ensue. Unfortunately, not all of the causes a business might choose to support are so clearly inflammatory, and the truth is there will always be a non-zero chance that any given stand you take might offend someone…

For example, if you were a Boy Scout when you were younger you might believe in that organization and offer to sponsor some activity or campaign the Scouts are working on. You’d probably be disturbed to find out that some people would interpret this to mean that you (and your business) are homophobic and anti-gay-rights (due to the BSA membership policies) or that you support predators and child abuse because of the scandal about abuses within the organization being covered up. You might choose to sponsor a little league team because you like baseball and believe in youth sports, only to find yourself at the center of a firestorm because your local league does or does not permit female players, depending on where you live and who the more vocal groups in your community happen to be. Even environmental and public health groups are not safe…

In theory, every manager has a responsibility to the various stakeholders of the business to succeed, thereby providing employees with paychecks, local government with tax revenue, suppliers with sales, and customers with whatever product or service you offer; if the company is publically held you also have a fiduciary responsibility to the stockholders. But managers are still human, and even leaving aside the enormous publicity and public relations benefits available to you through supporting popular causes, some of us will want to use the power given to us to try to make the world a better place – on whatever dimension we believe is possible. So that brings us to the question:

Do we as managers have an ethical responsibility to make sure that our firm never does or says anything that could offend anyone, anywhere, whether or not their approval or enmity will ever make a financial difference to the company? If so, how are we supposed to accomplish this in a world where anyone might take offense at almost anything? Do we have to make sure that none of our employees publicly support any controversial organizations? How do we do that without violating their civil rights? Should we take steps to make sure that everyone in the world is repeatedly told that neither the company nor any of the people who work for it has ever had an opinion on any subject that anyone could possibly find offensive? Or should we simply do our jobs, run the company as best we can, donate to whatever causes we believe in, and keep that information and all of our other personal beliefs to ourselves?

It’s worth thinking about…

No comments: