If you missed it, back in
March the President announced that he had just come up with the idea of a new
(sixth) branch of the U.S. military, which he called the “Space Force.” This
isn’t really a new idea, of course; several previous attempts have been made to
establish a permanent armed service in space, most recently in 2016 with the
ill-fated “Space Corps” proposal. These have generally failed, either because
there was no clear mission for the space service to perform, the proposed
technology was either unavailable or economically unfeasible, or because the
proposed installations contravened the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 (which
prohibits the placement of weapons of mass destruction in orbit, on the Moon,
or on any other celestial body). None of this has kept various administrations
from shoveling money into those projects, however…
What is remarkable about the
current incarnation of the program is how little effort the government is
making to convince anyone that it isn’t just a giant boondoggle, almost exactly
the same concept as the 2016 “Space Corps” proposal only with additional
pork-barrel funding for satellites, launch vehicles, and gold-plated bonuses
for the extremely wealthy people who own the aerospace companies. It would be
nice to think that this had anything to do with forward-thinking defense or
security planning, or at the very least, that it was an intelligent effort to
stimulate economic growth in a high-tech sector in which the U.S. still has a
fairly strong position relative to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, it
appears to be the result of significant lobbying efforts by the aerospace
industry – and the extraordinary receptiveness of the current administration to
anything that gives away public money to its political backers…
You can check out the
excellent story about all of this from the Los Angeles Times if you’d like more
details on the political aspects. On the business side, the question isn’t so
much why our government wants to spend more money on flying pork (every U.S.
administration wants to spend more money on every kind of pork), but why this
proposal includes a massive duplication of personnel (particularly management
levels), headquarters facilities, equipment, and spacecraft, when the Air
Force, Army and Navy all have space-oriented units currently operating. One
might quite reasonably suggest that an increased focus on (non-nuclear)
space-based weapons could be important to national security, given the equivalent
programs appearing in both the Russian and the Chinese militaries. What baffles
me is why anyone, even aerospace industry lobbyists, would want to do so in the
least financially responsible way possible…
No comments:
Post a Comment