You can pick up the original story on the New York TimesSports page online if you want to, but what they’re talking about is an
internationally-known professor and long-serving chairman of the African and
Afro-American studies department at UNC Chapel Hill being indicted for having
received payment for teaching classes that never happened – and which mainly
enrolled athletes from North Carolina’s more popular and lucrative varsity
teams. In many universities this sort of thing would be detected quickly, since
it is unusual for the chair of a department to teach classes at all, and
typical oversight would have noticed something fishy, but apparently the African
and Afro-American studies department and related disciplines at UNC are highly Balkanized,
and very little scrutiny is given to anything. The first, and frequently only,
defense against this kind of shenanigans is the supervision of the department
chair – which will not help much when he or she is the one committing the fraud…
Now, it’s possible that this is an isolated case, and the
rest of the classes taken by student-athletes at North Carolina are completely
legitimate. It’s even possible that this whole story is a misunderstanding, a
witch hunt, or just really bad record-keeping, and that none of these allegations
will prove to be true – there has been no court decision yet, and until there
is we must assume that the professor in our story is innocent. Unfortunately,
it’s also possible that every one of these accusations is correct, or even that
this is only the tip of the iceberg. I’m calling it to your attention mostly
because of the breakdown this represents in the university system – and the
fact that any of these events are taking place is enough to prove that the
breakdown, at least, is very real…
In almost any business enterprise, the individual who spends
the money and the individual who authorizes the expenses should not be the same
person. In the case of publically-held corporations, third-party audits are a
Federal requirement, and in most government organizations (including state
universities) the fiscal officer who reviews expenditures (including salary)
can’t be the same person who is authorizing those expenditures. Unfortunately, such
protocols are often ignored or circumvented as cumbersome, slow, or wasteful,
since “everyone knows” that their company or agency would never hire anyone who
would falsify financial records in the first place. In extreme cases this leads
to scandals like the Enron and Global Crossing situations, but in academia it
can lead to a well-respected institution granting college credit for classes
that never actually existed…
In the long run I strongly suspect that the UNC case will
prove to be a rare aberration in an otherwise honorable profession. Whether
that will come about because no one is actually perpetrating such frauds, or
because everyone else in America who is guilty of such malfeasance takes the
hint from this case and starts looking for other ways to game the system
remains to be seen, of course…